Small Sided Game Written Guide.
"Ninety-nine times out of a hundred when a coach has
an influence, it is negative influence."
Jan Mulder
The following article was written by Glen Buckley, Director of Coaching for the New York State West Youth Soccer Association. The original can be found at their web site www.nyswysa.org .We are grateful for their allowing us to reprint it here.
Small sided games... The game to develop players
By invitation I traveled recently to conduct a session for a group of boys. They were a travel group, I was told they were challenging for the league title and would be leaving on a three day road this next weekend to play in a four game mini tournament. The kids were great... just like most kids of that age, they were definitely more committed to having fun than learning about soccer.
Before I had a chance to ask the coach what he would like me to cover with the boys he approached me, " The boys are having great difficulty playing out of the back", he shared, " and were not holding on to the ball for long enough to allow our wide mids to get round the back". He went on to tell me that his choice of the 3-2-2 was not getting the right results and so was considering a change to the 2-3-2 system. They only managed, and I quote... " To secure the points in last weeks third game of the weekend through a rather dubious penalty that Rocket converted in the dying seconds". ( All the kids had nicknames... Speedy, Crunch, Ice, Elmer he was the GK!!!)
Ten or so minutes into the session I determined that the players really struggled to pass the ball from A to B. They had limited technical ability that certainly would not allow them to execute the tactical expectations of the coach. Getting them to spread out was as far tactically that I attempted to take them.
In talking with the coach at the end of the session he failed to see players limitations and their greater interest in basically running around at the expense of learning. He still concerned himself with tactics and systems.
He said he enjoyed the session which really became a challenge of finding a series of fun activities to keep the players under control.
I have found myself thinking about this situation a lot. I was initially disappointed with the coach. Then my frustration turned toward the children for their lack of discipline... this then made me question myself.
Did I have a bad day? Was I not on form?
Months down the line I have now stopped trying to blame the Coach, the Players or myself. I have, instead come to the conclusion that we were all so far apart in what we believed we were really there for that the session was doomed before it ever got started. The players saw the session as an opportunity to have some fun, interact with other players and do what most kids love to do, run around. The coach saw it as an opportunity to perfect a tactical game plan that I doubt the players comprehended, much less could have executed. I saw the session as an opportunity to teach the players some tried and tested stuff, regardless of whether they needed it or not.
The scenario I have just described is quite common place. The coach was a highly motivated volunteer with a sincere interest in the children. He wanted to provide the best product and he showed initiative in seeking my help to refine that product. The players ( and parents ) participated in the process and duly traveled the required distances to compete in and win their elite division. Unfortunately the product had driven the process to such a degree that nothing much was being achieved. The requirements of the play made no sense, or make any reference to the most important component... the players.
Theses were the "best" U-9's, playing in the "elite" division. (Now for the fireworks.) It is in my opinion that every time these players travel longer than 45 minutes to play or practice, they are wasting time that could have been spent with a ball. If they are asked to win before they are taught how to play they are not developing any soccer ability. In an 8v8 they are losing valuable and frequent exposure to the ball with opponents on the field. Every time they are advised on the tactical implications of their 8v8 formation they are having their time wasted.
To those of you that say that U-9's can make total sense of the 8v8 competitive game and play a well executed model of the senior game... I have two answers... Either you have a group of players that were developed in a different environment, different State, County or planet than the typical New York State West prototype, or, we are just fooling ourselves into thinking that we can see a "method to this madness" even while the players are unable to because they are simply not equipped to deal with the demands of the product.
There is a growing number of clubs throughout the Country that have initiated a Small Sided game program into their system. 4v4 for U-6 through U-8. I agree that a goalkeeper needs to be introduced at some stage and I am happy for this to take place at U-9. However, I would suggest playing 5v5 or 6v6 including the GK at U-9 and U-10. U-11 is where I would begin 8v8 with 11v11 beginning at U-12.
In one particular State a group of clubs got together, pulled out of their respective leagues with U-9 and U-10. Then they played against an opposing club every other week. Boys going one way, girls the other. Each club hosting a different age group and gender. Three or four 15 minute games against a different opponent each game. No more than 15 minutes of travel time, no referee's, no scores or records kept. One club even changed the players on each team each week. I went to watch, and saw just as much competitive spirit as any "elite" league game. I also saw less parental involvement. Developmentally I saw better players learning how to play with lesser players, and vice versa. I saw players learning how to lose. I saw the so called "superstars" character get tested; do they still want the ball when they are losing?
Another experiment that I actually implemented in my own club in Minnesota was a spreading of the talent. At U-9 and U-10 we would spread the talent evenly over three teams. We would then play the teams in the middle division. We found this had no adverse effect whatsoever on the children. When we formed our Division 1 or Premiere teams at U-12 we more than competed. In actual fact we had a Premiere team in both boys and girls leagues at U-13 through U-16 over the five year spreading of the talent experiment. The club was also well represented at ODP State and Regional events.
For those of you that would argue that 4v4 or 5v5 is radically different from the 11v11 senior game I would urge you to watch a high level professional game. Tape the game. When a player is in possession freeze the play. Count how many players are in close vicinity to the player in possession. You will discover that the game is made up of a connected series of 1v1, 2v1, 3v2 etc. duels and combinations that shift all over the field. At this level the little combinations take place at lightening speed. In youth soccer, very often the combinations don't work and are at a slower speed, but, they are essentially the same ingredients of the game. If youth players were in small sided games they would have more opportunity to be around the ball. They would then have more chances to experience the problems of being in possession. Being exposed to these situations over and over again is how players become good "problem solvers" which normally means they make good decisions.
Realistically it will be a long time, and maybe never, before we can get away from the obsession some have of winners and losers at U-9 and U-10. That being the case there is always going to be the need for different levels of play. I would still look forward to the day when we stop "labeling" players by our perception of their ability until they are U-11 or U-12.
The evolution of many clubs can be traced back to a time when we had less knowledge of how young children developed and how they learnt to play games like soccer. Those times are gone forever and a vast wealth of new and enlightening ideas are being or have been used in youth development. The results are there for all to see and are regularly published in the soccer media. The sad part is the people that need to read and study it... DON'T.
The subject would be one that players, parents, coaches and officials could benefit from discussing and considering further.
|
